USAID's Sudan Scandal: $850 Million and the War Economy That Runs the Hamas Model Better Than Hamas

By Chama Mechtaly

AI generate illustrative image

USAID's own Office of Inspector General dropped a damning evaluation on June 1, 2026 — not about a bureaucratic failure, but about what happens when nearly a billion dollars in American taxpayer money enters one of the most sophisticated Islamist war economies on earth with no one watching the door. What the report found was not simple mismanagement, but a failure of oversight so systemic and so conveniently undocumented that it can no longer be treated as accidental: an accountability structure that existed in theory and nowhere else — and someone, somewhere, made sure of it.

USAID's Sudan Aid Program and Missing Oversight

In 2024, the United States was Sudan's largest humanitarian donor, committing $880.3 million — 43 percent of all international aid to the country. As of June 2025, USAID held 31 active awards worth $853 million before offloading the entire portfolio to the State Department. For a crisis of that magnitude, the oversight was a fiction. Between January and June 2025, USAID scheduled 21 monitoring site visits for over $1.04 billion in active awards. Eleven were completed. Four were cancelled. Six never happened at all. The agency could not produce a country monitoring plan for Sudan. Officials claimed one had existed — then said it was lost in deactivated email accounts when the Office of Inspector General pressed for details.

Inspector General Findings: Missing Records and Failed Monitoring

Sudan remains the worst displacement and hunger crisis on earth: more than 25 million people facing acute food insecurity and famine conditions, over 15 million displaced. The report found that three of the five high-value awards reviewed — each exceeding $5 million, each with multiple complaints attached — were missing critical financial, performance, and monitoring documents from the agency's own systems. A tracker listing more than 45 open, unresolved program irregularities — fraud allegations, looting, armed seizures, worker threats, beneficiary deaths — was never handed to the State Department during the transition. USAID provided zero response to the OIG's draft findings. The State Department inherited a near-billion-dollar portfolio stripped of documentation, institutional records, and any functioning accountability mechanism.

The silence from USAID officials on every single OIG finding suggests they already know the answer to the question they hoped nobody would ask.

How Humanitarian Aid Becomes Part of Sudan's War Economy

Since the conflict erupted in April 2023, Sudanese armed factions have turned humanitarian logistics into weapons of war — looting convoys, seizing warehouses, controlling distribution networks, and harassing the workers operating them. Fuel depots, medical supplies, beneficiary lists, and port access roads are not neutral assets in that environment. They are instruments of territorial control.

The specific irregularities on record are stark. Sudanese military intelligence affiliated with the Islamist-aligned SAF seized medical commodities — documented at $62,438. Armed fighters diverted and seized fuel —  with potential losses up to $250,000, with $45,000 to $50,000 in direct theft confirmed. Those are the cases that made it into complaints. The cases that went unreported are the ones that should keep people up at night.

Sudan's Islamist Networks and the Origins of the Hamas Model

Sudan's particular danger is structural and historical. Hassan al-Turabi's National Islamic Front spent the 1990s building the template for what is now called the Hamas model: blending armed power with welfare infrastructure, leveraging charities, aid corridors, and parallel governance to extract resources, build local legitimacy, and outlast their enemies. Sudan hosted and trained Hamas with the help of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard — running weapons corridors through Port Sudan to Gaza, establishing training centers, and embedding IRGC doctrine inside Sudan's security services. The infrastructure did not collapse after the 2019 ousting of Islamist dictator Al Bashir. It simply regrouped and reorganized. Sudan's aid-capture strategy is older than Hamas's and operates with a discipline the latter spent decades trying to match. Aid capture is how it feeds itself — not soldiers looting a convoy, but a chain of command that has made diversion a financial lifeline.

The Information War: Media Narratives and Western Blind Spots

And while that machine runs, a second war runs alongside it — far more strategic and costlier in the long term, and almost entirely uncontested. It is fought in headlines, editorial choices, and the framing Western audiences receive before they've had time to form a question. Al Jazeera, the flagship broadcaster of a Brotherhood-adjacent worldview bankrolled by a Qatari royal family that has funded Hamas and its affiliates for decades, covers Sudan with the same editorial logic it deploys wherever the Brotherhood has a stake: the counter-Islamist forces become colonizers, the Islamist officer corps becomes resistance, the civilians crushed between them become backdrop. The Brotherhood networks inside Sudan's military — the same networks that crushed the 2019 democratic transition and launched this war to reclaim the state — have remained largely invisible to the Western audiences whose governments are writing the checks.

Into that information vacuum, nearly a billion taxpayer dollars flowed — unverified, untracked, and absorbed by a war economy that the dominant narrative had been carefully engineered to keep out of frame.

Why Sudan Matters: Iran, Russia, and the Red Sea

Gaza gets the headlines, and Hamas's aid-diversion machine has been mapped, documented, and condemned by many— but Sudan's version is older, larger, and far more consequential. Sudan covers nearly a third of Africa's Red Sea coastline, a corridor where Iran has been airlifting Mohajer-6 drones to Port Sudan since late 2023, seeking a naval foothold in exchange — a presence that would extend Tehran's reach to the same waterway the Houthis have already weaponized against American allies and global shipping. Russia, having switched sides from RSF to SAF in 2024, is pursuing its own basing rights on the same coastline. The prize is Port Sudan. The price, paid in part by American taxpayers, was nearly a billion dollars routed through Tom Perriello's portfolio as Special Envoy from February 2024 through January 2025, with safeguards that, by USAID's own inspector general's account, barely functioned at best or were deliberately dismantled at worst. The people who ran that portfolio have not been asked to explain themselves in public, under oath, where the answers would actually matter.

Congressional Accountability and the Questions USAID Has Not Answered

The OIG did its job, and USAID responded with silence on every finding and every recommendation — a silence that serves as its own confession. Sudan's civilians, trapped in an endless war, deserve an aid operation that can account for every dollar that moves through their country in their name, and American taxpayers funding it at nearly a billion dollars a year deserve exactly the same. Without mandatory vetting, aggressive tracking, and consequences for those who looked away, none of this gets fixed — it simply repeats, as it already has.

Congress has the subpoena power, the platform, and now the administration's blessing to go after the people who ran this portfolio into the ground. The paper trail is sitting in the OIG's files. The only thing missing is the will to pull them in front of a camera and demand an answer, under oath, for every dollar that vanished into a war economy on their watch.

Chama Mechtaly is a policy advisor, artist, entrepreneur, and the founder of the Emma Lazarus Institute. She leads initiatives on de-radicalisation, cultural memory, and regional integration in the Middle East and North Africa.